Findlaw’s Pants on Fire - Denying Sale of Links

Posted by admin on Sep 06 2008 | Lawyer Marketing

It’s pretty clear when you read through the comments on the blogosphere backing Findlaw that either:

1. These are Findlaw employees defending Findlaw
2. The people defending Findlaw do not understand the situation completely.

Let me make this perfectly clear: Findlaw is lying to their clients and to the public. They ARE selling links to law firms.

Now why would they lie? Why would they say “No, we are not selling links to law firms” when they are? The short simple answer is money. As an ex Findlaw employee I can say through experience that they are more concerned about profit margins and sales numbers then they are about the success of their clients. Findlaw does not want to refund any part of the millions of dollars the sales of the links packages has generated (read the comments of FormerFL Rep who by the way is not me).

There’s a lot of good people over there and I have friends there. But that doesn’t change the fact that what they are doing is wrong. Law firms come to Findlaw to help them with their Internet advertising and sometimes Findlaw does a good job of that. Their legal directory gets a large amount of traffic and it can be a good source of attorney referrals. However, what most attorneys are concerned about is getting their website high visibility in the search engines, namely Google since that search engine dominates search market share and thus provides the best opportunity for generating new clientele. By breaking Google’s rule against the sale of links that can impact rankings, Findlaw is putting their clients at risk from being able to generate clients from the best source when it comes to the search engines. Google webmaster guidelines state:
“Practices that violate our guidelines may result in a negative adjustment of your site’s presence in Google, or even the removal of your site from our index.”
Google’s webmaster guidelines also state:
“Ultimately, you are responsible for the actions of any companies you hire”.
This means law firms can be punished for buying links from Findlaw. Even if they don’t know that it breaks Google’s guidelines. The great majority of lawyers have absolutely no idea that this goes against Google’s rules but unfortunately they are still responsible. What happens often in cases like these is Google will prevent the links pages that Findlaw is selling from passing any link value to the law firm websites. So, you have some law firms spending upwards of $30,000 a year for links that do not help their rankings. That is just sad. These links are definitely not meant to provide traffic so that is not even a possible argument. You can see some of the pages that Findlaw is selling by clicking on the “more” link located in the footer. That page leads to a page that links to a handful of the links pages. Obviously, that is not meant to provide traffic considering it is practically hidden at the bottom of the page.

Law firms who are considering buying the links packages from Findlaw need to know all this. Does anyone really believe that law firms would buy these links packages if they were told that they could be penalized by Google or that the links could potentially be worthless? I don’t think so. I don’t blame the Findlaw sales reps though because the reps don’t even know that it’s against Google guidelines. They say what they are told by corporate and corporate is not telling their sales reps the whole story.

2 comments for now

2 Responses to “Findlaw’s Pants on Fire - Denying Sale of Links”

  1. Robert Hoffman

    I think your comment is a little offensive that you think you somehow know what is happening and others do not know. What source of information do you have that others do not have access to? When you say Findlaw lied, what did they lie about? When you say they were busted..what were they busted doing, selling links? Alert Alert Alert - Selling links is not illegal. If you have proof that findlaw was selling “google page rank” then please provide a link. No one else on any other blog can seem to do that. I could care less whether findlaw burns to the ground becuase I do not work there but when people run around making broad cliams and mixing facts with speculation and then thing they are right and everyone else is wrong, it pisses me off.

    07 Sep 2008 at 7:29 am

  2. info

    Robert,

    I was a Findlaw employee for nearly two years so I have a lot of information that others don’t have access to. I’ve spoken with Findlaw employees in the past year specifically about the sale of these links, long before it became an issue with Google. I also know that the attorneys who I’ve spoken to about this were promised improved rankings in Google. In fact, the last attorney I spoke with about this was specifically told that his rankings would improve in Google. Now, this doesn’t mean that every rep is telling lawyers that their rankings in Google will improve but if you talk to other lawyers who purchased the links package, I’m willing to bet that many were told their rankings would improve.

    What did they lie about? They are lying about not selling links because in fact they are. If you read my post you’ll see I never said selling links is illegal. It’s not. Google doesn’t make the law.

    No, you don’t work for Findlaw but your IP address is tied to thejobnetwork.com. Interesting that the The Job Network.com is owned by Redmatch, who, in turn, owns RealMatch. Didn’t RealMatch just partner with Findlaw? Think so. Understandable why you are defending them.

    Mike

    07 Sep 2008 at 6:05 pm

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply